Rocket Fuel for Runners
The question has been raised, how would you compare sweeteners and where does honey stand when compared to the nutritional benefits of other sweeteners. Many studies have been done comparing nutritional benefits of sweeteners; the general consensus from double-blind studies is as follows: Refined sugar, corn syrup, and agave nectar offer the least nutritional benefits; raw cane sugar is slightly higher than the first three mentioned; maple syrup, brown sugar, and honey are considered intermediates; and, dark and black–strap molasses offer the highest nutritional benefits among sweeteners.
It should be remembered that all sweeteners contain relatively few nutritional benefits when compared to the benefits that could be derived from applying the same caloric expenditures toward the consumption of whole fruits, vegetables, grains, or legumes and by omitting the consumption of unecessary sweeteners. Therefore, regardless of the superiority of one sweetener over another, sweeteners should be used minimally or not at all.
If sweeteners are used minimally, using one versus another will not promote a significant health difference in one's diet. Therefore as you limit your use of sweeteners to a minimal usage, you can use whichever sweetener enhances any particular recipe best. For example, a touch of agave nectar. or maple syrup, or honey might provide superior enjoyment to black molasses within a smoothie, whereas black molasses might provide a richer experience with naturally leavened bread. As you experiment with sweeteners, remember they have little to no nutritional value and are generally considered empty calories that lead to weight gains and other problems.
The average consumption of 70 kilograms of sweetener per American per year is far too high and is unhealthful. Some evidence indicates it may even be higher among the LDS population. If you are determined to use this much sweetener in your diet, you will derive greater benefits by using intermediate or high sweeteners on the list above. However, when comparing nutritional benefits of foods which do not easily sustain health, one must wonder about the relevance of such a discussion.
Significant changes in eating trends have occured between the early 1900s and today which greatly affect each of our lives. All of the "blue-zone regions" of the world, where people suffer the least disease and enjoy the greatest longevity, eat today very similarly to the way Americans ate in the early 1900s. By comparison, the average American today consumes 93% of his calories from sugar, oil, refined and processed grains, and animal-based foods. Only seven percent of today's caloric choices are derived from whole fruits, vegetables, grains, and legumes.
What you must come to terms with, if you desire greater dietary health, is that our society is already preset for dietary failure. If you simply go with today's dietary flow, you will exerience diet-induced diseases and premature death. By comparison, if you happened to live in rural Taiwan, your chances of dietary success would be infinitely greater. Why? Because the dietary flow in rural Taiwan does not include unhealthful church and neighborhood socials; nor would you walk or drive down streets in rural Taiwan that are lined with fast-food joints; nor would you shop in grocery stores that contain over 250,000 unhealthful food products; and you would not watch TV commericials that stimulate false appetite and that promote unhealthful foods. Rather, your natural environmental food choices would lead to a diet high in fresh fruits and vegetables and whole grains and that limited animal-based food consumption to less than 10% of your caloric intake. You would a sound diet without even having to think about it.
In America, the only way you can have a healthful diet is to become educated and wise in your dietary decisions. If you just go with the flow, the flow is failing and so will you, 100% guaranteed! The only Blue-Zone region in the world that exists among westernized civilizations is Loma Linda, California, where 95% of the residents are Seventh-Day Adventists, who are taught a lacto-ovo vegetarian diet that is exceptionally high in intake of whole fruits, vegetables, grains, and legumes. Through education, they have risen above devastating western dietary trends.
Because of superior dietary education residents of Loma Linda thrive dietarily while most Americans fail. They offer the promise, that even in westernized civilizations, it is possible to overcome unhealthful church and neighborhood socials, unhealthful church and university cafeterias, streets that are lined with fast-food joints, and grocery stories that contain far more unhealthful than healthful food choices.
Become educated, master the principles of sustainable dietary health, and become an exceptional influence for good in your neighborhood and community. Remember also, that a shining example, love, and great tasiting healthful meals shared with others speak more loudly than words to the unintiated. Constraint, harsh words, and passing judgment upon those who do not follow sound dietary counsel helps no one.
Jim
Tags:
Jim: I am really mixed up about this sugar thing. I have been told at least for the past two years that blue agave was an excellent replacement for sugar and it was great for diabetics because it did not raise their glycemic index. You even had it on your last sale. Greensmoothie girl also says it is an excellent source of sweetner????
In your call-in show today you spoke about unrefined agave. Would you please give me the brandname that you use?
© 2023 Created by James Simmons.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service